Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper attempts to discuss the proper methodology in search for the authentic Islamic History. It discusses the relationship between two sister-disciplines, i.e. ?ad?th and History, their likenesses, many problems which the historians of Early Islam have to face in their research and the possibility of employing unique methodology of the study of ?ad?th on the study of Early Islamic History. The paper benefits from a plethora of monographs written by contemporary scholars of Islamic Studies. I conclude that Isn?d-cum-Matn Analysis developed separately by Gregor Schoeler and Harald Motzki seems promising for the study of Early Islam.This paper attempts to discuss the proper methodology in search for the authentic Islamic History. It discusses the relationship between two sister-disciplines, i.e. ?ad?th and History, their likenesses, many problems which the historians of Early Islam have to face in their research and the possibility of employing unique methodology of the study of ?ad?th on the study of Early Islamic History. The paper benefits from a plethora of monographs written by contemporary scholars of Islamic Studies. I conclude that Isn?d-cum-Matn Analysis developed separately by Gregor Schoeler and Harald Motzki seems promising for the study of Early Islam.

Keywords

Early Islam Tradition Historiography Ḥadīth Isnād-cum-Matn Analysis

Article Details

How to Cite
Amal, K. . (2020). Hadith dan Sejarah: Pencarian terhadap Sejarah Islam yang Otentik. Khazanah, 10(2), 207-214. https://doi.org/10.37108/khazanah.v10i2.346

References

  1. Anthony, Sean W. 2020. Mu?ammad and the Empires of Faith: The Making of the Prophet of Islam. California: University of California Press.
  2. Berg, Herbert. “The Implications of, and Opposition to, the Methods of John Wansbrough.”Dalam Ibn Warraq (Ed.). 2000. The Quest for the Historical Mu?ammad. New York: Prometheus Books.
  3. Brown, Peter. 1971.The World of Late Antiquity: From Marcus Aurelius to Mu?ammad.London: Thames and Hudson.
  4. Crone and Michael Cook, Patricia.1977. Hagarism: The Making of the Islamic World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Crone, Patricia. 1987. Meccan Trade and the Rise of Islam. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  6. ____________. 2005. “How Did the Quranic Pagans Make a Living?” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. Vol. 68, No. 3. 387-399.
  7. ____________.2007. “Quraysh and the Roman Army: Making Sense of the Meccan Leather Trade.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies. Vol. 70, No. 1: 63-88.
  8. Goerke, Andreas.2011. “Prospects and Limits in the Study of the Historical Mu?ammad.” Dalam N. Boekhoff-van der Voort, K. Versteegh, and J. Wagemakers (Eds.). 2020. The Transmission and Dynamics of the Textual Sources of Islam: Essays in Honour of Harald Motzki. Leiden: Brill.
  9. Goerke, H. Motzki, & G. Schoeler, Andreas. 2012. “First-Century Sources for the Life of Mu?ammad? A Debate.” Der Islam 89. 2-59.
  10. Humphreys, R. S. 1991. Islamic History: A Framework for Inquiry. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  11. Ibn ?ajar al-‘Asqal?n?. 1326. Tahdh?b al-Tahdh?b. India: Ma?ba’at D?’irat al-Ma’?rif al-Ni??miyyah.
  12. Ibn Hish?m. 1955.al-S?rah al-Nabawiyyah li Ibn Hish?m. Mesir: Shirkah Maktabah wa Ma?ba’ah Mu??af? al-B?b? al-?alab? wa Awl?dihi.
  13. Juynboll, Gauthier H. A.1993. “N?fi?, the Mawl? of Ibn ?Umar, and his Position in Muslim ??ad?th Literature.”Der Islam 70 (1993). 207–244; 211.
  14. Khalidi, Tarif. 1994.Arabic Historical Thought in the Classical Period. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Ma’mar ibn R?shid. 2014. Kit?b al-Magh?z?. New York: New York University Press.
  16. Motzki, Harald.“The Murder of Ibn Ab? al-?uqayq: On the Origin and Reliability of Some Magh?z?-Reports.”Dalam Harald Motzki (Ed.) 2000. The Biography of Mu?ammad: The Issue of the Sources. Leiden: Brill.
  17. ____________. 2010. Analysing Muslim Traditions: Studies in Legal, Exegetical, and Maghazi ?adith. Leiden: Brill.
  18. Schacht, Joseph. 1950. The Origins of Mu?ammadan Jurisprudence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  19. Schoeler, Gregor. 2009.The Genesis of Literature in Islam: From the Aural to the Read. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  20. Shoemaker, Stephen J. 2011. “In Search of ‘Urwa’s Sira: Some Methodological Issues in the Quest for ‘Authenticity’ in the Life of Mu?ammad.” Der Islam 85. 257–344.
  21. Vansina, Jan.1985. Oral Tradition as History. Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin
  22. Press.
  23. Al-W?qid?, 1989. al-Magh?z?.Beirut: D?r al-A’l?m?.
  24. http://baltimorechronicle.com/2006/042606aliKhan.shtml (diakses pada 21 Oktober 2020).
  25. https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/topos (diakses pada 8 Maret 2020).