##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

The present study aims to compare the Battle of Uhud and the Battle of Mu’ta as described in Nasrudin Taha’s work on Islamic Education. The problem examined in this study concerns the importance of understanding the differences in characteristics, strategies, as well as the moral and spiritual lessons of these two historical events within the context of teaching Islamic history. A comparative study is needed because both battles reflect different situations and dynamics, yet each contains important educational values for shaping the character of Muslim learners. The purpose of this research is to identify the similarities and differences between the Battle of Uhud and the Battle of Mu’ta, and to explore the relevance of their historical values in Islamic education. This study employs library research with a qualitative–descriptive approach, in which data are analyzed from Nasrudin Taha’s text along with other supporting sources. The findings show that the Battle of Uhud emphasizes lessons on obedience and the consequences of internal strategic negligence, whereas the Battle of Mu’ta highlights steadfastness and courage in facing an enemy of significantly greater strength. Both battles contribute meaningfully to the development of leadership, faith, and discipline within Islamic education.

Keywords

Perang Uhud, Perang Mut’ah, Naskah, Islam, Nasrudin Taha

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Fadhilah, A., Gifari, A. R., Fath, M. N. A., Hudaidah, & Yati, R. M. (2025). KOMPARASI PERANG UHUD DAN MUT’AH DALAM NASKAH PENDIDIKAN ISLAM KARYA NASRUDIN TAHA. Khazanah: Jurnal Sejarah Dan Kebudayaan Islam, 15(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.15548/khazanah.v15i2.2370

##journal.references##

  1. Al-Buthy. The Great Episodes of Muhammad Saw, 2015.
  2. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 2008.
  3. Fikriana, Askana. “Etika Politik Dan Kualifikasi Calon Legislatif Dalam Pemilu : Perspektif Fiqih Siyasah.” ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora 2, no. 1 (2024): 235–48.
  4. Fikriana, Askana, andNandaMuntazza. “Etika Dan Batasan Hukum Dalam Perang: Analisis Terhadap Kejahatan Humaniter Dalam Fiqih Siyasah.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Sosial 1, no. 4 (2023): 329–40. https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v1i4.1522.
  5. Habibi, Nicolas, Izzat MuhammadDaud, andJalwis. “Refleksi Kepemimpinan Dan Strategi Perang Nabi Muhammad ( Studi Kontekstual Legitimasi Sejarah Perang Uhud ).” Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, Adab Dan Dakwah 2, no. 2 (2020): 203–23.
  6. Hasanah, Zuriatun, andAhmad ShofiyulHimami. “Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dalam Menumbuhkan Keaktifan Belajar Siswa.” Irsyaduna: Jurnal Studi Kemahasiswaaan 1, no. 1 (2021): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.54437/irsyaduna.v1i1.236.
  7. Iqbal. “Perang Uhud.” Jurnal Rihlah I (2014): 15–28.
  8. Irawan, Heri. “Peradaban Islam Masa Nabi Muhammad Saw.” Ihya Al Arabiyah, 2020.
  9. Kasdi, Abdurrahman. “Genealogi Dan Sejarah Perkembangan Politik Islam.” ADDIN 9, no. 2 (2015): 277–308.
  10. Masyitha, Andi Angelina, NyongImam Santoso Eka Teguh, andMuhammadRidwan. “Peran Dan Kontribusi Nusaibah Binti Ka’ab Dalam Perang Uhud Pada Tahun 625 M.” Jurnal Sejarah Islam 3, no. 2 (2024): 57–79.
  11. Maulidah, Ummu Zakiyah. “Muhammad Sebagai Pemimpin Agama Dan Negara Periode Makkah Dan Madinah.” ULUL ALBAB Jurnal Studi Islam 14, no. 3 (2014): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v14i3.2658.
  12. Mubasyaroh. “Karakteristik Dan Strategi Dakwah Rasulullah Muhammad Saw Pada Periode Makkah.” AT-TABSYIR: Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam 3, no. 2 (2015): 383–404. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/at-tabsyir.v3i2.1653.
  13. Muhammad Yamin. “Peradaban Islam Pada Masa Nabi Muhammad Saw.” Ihya Al Arabiyah 3, no. 1 (2017): 112. https://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/ihya/article/view/705/516.
  14. Munir, Samsul. “Politik Pendidikan Islam Berbasis Multikultural : Konsep Dan Strategi Pembelajaran Agama Islam Dalam Mewujudkan Islam Rahmatan Li Al- ‘ Ā Lam ī N.” DIROSAT Journal of Islamic Studies 2, no. 2 (2017): 149–82. https://doi.org/10.28944/dirosat.v2i2.105.
  15. Pondaag, Gustavo Gilbert. “TINJAUAN HUKUM INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP TINDAKAN MILITER ARGENTINA DAN INGGRIS DI KEPULAUAN FALKLAND TANPA ADANYA DEKLARASI PERANG 1982,” 2023.
  16. Rasli, Amran, Salman BashirMemon, Silvi AsnaPrestianawati, andImelda HermilindaAbas. “Leadership Lessons from the Battle of Uhud.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 14, no. 2 (2024): 355–69. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.142.21.
  17. Rohmah, Tazkiyyatur. “Strategi Peperangan Khalid Bin Walid Dalam Perang Mu’Tah Dan Perang Yarmuk.” JSI: Jurnal Sejarah Islam 1, no. 01 (2022): 95–109. https://doi.org/10.24090/jsij.v1i1.6642.
  18. Sari, Endang. “Sejarah Perang Uhud Dalam Pembentukan Karakter Taat Kepada Pemimpin,” 2016. https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/29233/1/Endang Sari, 1802011064, FTK, PAI, 082235893541 ok-1.pdf.
  19. Setiarso, Gunawan. “Legitmasi Nasab Dan Strategi Dakwah Habib Ba ’ Alwi Dalam Perspektif Muhammadiyah” 3 (2025): 216–24. https://doi.org/10.62083/7d8qcb83.
  20. Shidqi, Hasbi Ash, KalamSetia, ImamSujoko, andSyaeroziHasan. “Nilai – Nilai Pendidikan Dalam Perang Uhud.” Fikiran Masyarakat 3, no. 2 (2015): 52–80.
  21. Shihab, M. Quraish. “TAFSIR AL-M ISHBAH Pesan, Kesan Dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an VOLUME 4 Surah Al-An’am” 4 (2007): 377.
  22. Shomad, Bukhori Abdul. “Piagam Madinah Dan Resolusi Konflik.” Al-AdYaN 8, no. 2 (2013): 53–66.
  23. Simorangkir, Jungjungan. “SEJARAH AWAL ISLAM SAMPAI MASA KHALIFAH ALRASYDIN.” TE DEUM Jurnal Teologi & Pengembangan Pelayanan 4, no. 1 (2014): 121–49.
  24. Syam, M Basir. “KEBIJAKAN DAN PRINSIP PRINSIP KENEGARAAN NABI MUHAMMAD SAW DI MADINAH ( 622-632 M ).” KRITIS : Jurnal Sosial Ilmu Politik Universitas Hasanuddin 1, no. 1 (2015): 157–74.
  25. Ummah, Siti Rohmatul. “RELEVANSI PERINTAH IQRA ’ PADA WAHYU PERTAMA BAGI MASYARAKAT MODERN.” PANCAWAHANA: Jurnal Studi Islam 12, no. 1 (2017): 21–38

Most read articles by the same author(s)