##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abstract

This article aims to explain the results of the analysis through a comparison of historiographical works in the form of the Sirah Nabawiyah written by Ibn Ishaq and Ibn Hisham. The research method used is a historical research method with four steps, those are: 1) Heuristics or source collection, the data collection technique used is a literature study by looking for the sirah nabawiyah Ibn Ishaq and Ibn Hisham, as well as books and journal articles relevant to the research. this; 2) Source Criticism; 3) Interpretation or analysis of data, the analysis is carried out in analyzing the selection of sources in making the Sirah Nabawiyah of these two figures, as well as writing the narrative of the sirah whether subjective or objective; 4) Historiography. The results of the study show that the objectivity of historical facts contained in Ibn Ishaq's works is a little weak but his works are perfected by Ibn Hisham's works. In terms of scientific methodology, Ibn Ishaq is not as strong as Ibn Hisham, Ibn Ishaq's sirah nabawiyah, some stories have weak source strengths and are slightly less relevant in some of the contents of his work, through Ibn Hisham many studies of Ibn Ishaq's sirah nabawiyah have been corrected, omitted irrelevant contents and sources and then perfected through the science of hadith transmission. Sirah Nabawiyah Ibn Hisham is the most trusted sirah to date.

Keywords

Analysis Historiography Ibnu Hisyam Ibnu Ishaq Sirah Nabawiyah

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Pratama, F. S. P. (2022). ANALISIS KOMPARATIF HISTORIOGRAFI SIRAH NABAWIYAH KARYA IBNU ISHAQ DAN IBNU HISYAM. Majalah Ilmiah Tabuah: Ta`limat, Budaya, Agama Dan Humaniora, 26(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.37108/tabuah.v26i1.677

##journal.references##

  1. Sumber: Sirah Nabawiyah
  2. Ibn Hisyam, Abu Muhammad bin Malik. (1994). Sirah Nabawiyah. Beirut: Danjil Fikr.
  3. Ibn Ishaq. Sirah Nabawiyah.
  4. Sumber Buku
  5. A. Daliman. (2015). Metode Penelitian Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
  6. Wilaela. (2016). Sejarah Islam Klasik. Pekanbaru: Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.
  7. Yatim, Badri. (1997). Historiografi Islam. Jakarta: Logos Wacana Ilmu.
  8. Sumber Tesis dan Jurnal
  9. Amal, Khairul. (2017). “Historiografi Jihad: Ekspedisi Militer Kaum Beriman di Madinah”. Thesis UIN Syarif Hidayatullah. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
  10. Effendi. (2013). “Menguak Historiografi Islam dari Tradisional-Konvensional Hingga Kritis Multidimensi”. Jurnal TAPIs Vol. 9 No.1.
  11. Hasbillah, Ahmad Ubaydi. (2012). “Sirah Nabawiyah dan Demitologisasi Kehidupan Nabi”. Journal of Qur’an and Hadits Vol.1 No.2 2012.
  12. Hartimah, Tati. (2002). “Sirah Nabawiyah”. Jurnal at-Turas Vol.7 No.1. Thaun 2002.
  13. Imyas, Rizkiyatul. (2008). “Metode Kritik Sanad dan Matan”. Ushulunna: Jurnal Ushuluddin UIN Jakarta.
  14. Musyafiq, Ahmad. (2014). “Rekontruksi Pesan Profetik Berdasarkan Koleksi Hadis dan Sirah Nabawiyah”. Jurnal At-Taqaddum Vol. 6 No.2 Tahun 2014.
  15. Susanto, Dwi. (2014). “Historiografi Islam: Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan dari Masa Klasik-Modern”. Journal Fakultas Adab dan Humaniora UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.
  16. Thohir, Ajid. (2012). “Historiografi Islam: Bio-Biografi dan Perkembangan Mazhab Fikih dan Tasawuf”. Journal Miqot Vol. XXXVI No.2 Juli-Desember Tahun 2012.
  17. Sumber Internet
  18. Manhaj Sirah Nabawiyah,
  19. https://www.muslimahnews.com/2019/05/14/manhaj-sirah-nabawiyyah/
  20. Muhhamad Abror, “Kontribusi Ibnu Ishaq dan Ibnu Hisyam dalam Penulisan Sirah Nabawiyah”, https://islam.nu.or.id/sirah-nabawiyah/kontribusi-ibnu-ishaq-dan-ibnu-hisyam-dalam-penulisan-sirah-nabawiyah-2qayg.
  21. Tengku Ibrahim Helmi, “Sirah Nabawiyah: Defenisi & Kepentingan Mempelajarinya’’, hal.13, https://www.academia.edu/22058226/SIRAH_NABAWIYYAH_Definisi_and_Kepentingan_Mempelajarinya. Kutipan buku “Fiqh as-Sirah an-Nabawiyyah, Munir al-Ghodban, al-Maktabah asy- Syamilah”.